Module 4 - SLP

Proposed Project/Plan

Your task for this module's SLP is to further discuss the plan identified in the case assignment. Please include the following: (Critical Thinking Skills Assignment)

1.Identify and clarify an ethical dilemma associated with the chosen topic of your course project.

2.Identify and discuss several alternatives and select one to address in your plan.

3.Explain the components in your hypothetical plan for resolving the problem by implementing the solution.

4.Present the plan in an outline and identify the roles of various participants in addressing the problem.

ASSIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS

Length: This assignment should be between 1-2 pages (250-500 words) in length, excluding references.

References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles).

Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper

Format: APA format is recommended. While APA formatting of references is not a requirement, the references need to be presented in order using a standard citation style (APA, AMA, MLA etc). When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it MUST be enclosed in quotes. The references should be cited within the text and also listed at the end of the assignment in the References section. See Syllabus page for more information on APA format.

Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted, assignments are expected to adhere to standards guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity.

The following items will be assessed in particular:

•Achievement of learning objectives for assignment

•Relevance (e.g. all content is connected to the question)

•Precision (e.g. specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate).

•Depth of discussion (e.g. present and integrate points that lead to deeper issues)

•Breadth (e.g. multiple perspectives and references, multiple issues/factors considered)

•Evidence (e.g. points are well-supported with facts, statistics and references)

•Logic (e.g. presented discussion makes sense, conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information)

•Clarity (e.g. writing is concise, understandable, and contains sufficient detail or examples)

•Objectivity (e.g. avoid use of first person and subjective bias)

At the bottom of this page, there is a link to a critical thinking rubric. The rubric WILL BE USED to assess the quality of your paper and assign a grade for this assignment. Please review it carefully before you begin this assignment. Your paper will be graded on the following attributes: organization, contextual awareness, knowledge of conventions, and appropriate use of sources and evidence. The point value for each attribute and what you'll need to do in order to earn the maximum possible points on this assignment can be found in the writing rubric.

The purpose of using this rubric is to assist you in strengthening your critical thinking skills. As you know, this is a skill set that's essential for establishing a successful career. If you have any questions regarding the expectations as outlined in the rubric, please don't hesitate to bring them to my attention.