Case Study Analysis HRM/552

Case Study Analysis Congress enacted laws for the security of both companies and employees; nonetheless, the courts have to construe and judge who is favored or not. The court examines the evidence and investigation showed to the court to know which law is applicable in the case. Still, there are some laws that are ambiguous that its interpretation can be so different to its spirit or purpose. A study of the case of State of Texas v. Hopwood (Byars & Rue, 2008), is an example on how courts infer the law. Case Summary In the case of State of Texas v. Hopwood, the School of Law of the University of Texas (Byars & Rue, 2008), the school sought after for the commencement of an affirmative action strategy that would enable the school to develop the...