Where do you stand on the issue regarding the use of anthropologists in intelligence gathering for the military? Can you come up with a compelling argument based on examples given in the text, your understanding of the ethical requirements of anthropologist, and from your own experiences /understanding of past and present military actions to take a stance on this issue? Please use concepts and terminology from the text.

I believe that they should not use anthropologist in intelligence gathering for the military. My reasoning for it is that it puts anthropologist in a sensitive position. For example, "Chile was to be the first case study for Project Camelot. Anthropologist Hugo Nuttini, who was only peripherally involved with the project, went to Chile and spoke with a local anthropologist...